History of RUNE

The Origins of RUNE: A Cross-Chain Liquidity Protocol

RUNE was developed as the native utility token of the THORChain network, a decentralized liquidity protocol designed to facilitate cross-chain asset swaps without the need for centralized order books. The project emerged as a response to one of crypto's most pressing challenges: cross-chain interoperability. Initially conceptualized in 2018, THORChain sought to resolve this issue in a fully decentralized manner, with RUNE playing a central role in the network's functionality.

Early Development and Testnet Launch

The roots of RUNE lie in THORChain’s initial development phase, during which its team remained pseudonymous—adding a layer of mystery and intrigue in comparison to other high-profile crypto projects. This anonymity led to skepticism in certain parts of the crypto community, especially given the then-prevailing trend of highly visible founders. Despite this, THORChain’s objective was clear: to enable seamless swaps between different blockchain networks, initially targeting Bitcoin and Ethereum.

By mid-2019, THORChain launched a single-chain Chaosnet—a prototype that allowed developers and early users to test the capabilities of RUNE and the broader platform. Though the Chaosnet lacked full functionality, it illustrated the foundational role RUNE would play within the ecosystem by functioning as a liquidity asset for swap processes and securing the network through bonding.

Mainnet Release and Incentive Pendulum

In early 2021, after extensive testing, THORChain successfully launched its mainnet. This marked the beginning of RUNE's official role in securing liquidity pools, incentivizing network participants, and providing the base currency for swaps. RUNE operates as a “settlement asset” within the network’s Continuous Liquidity Pool (CLP) model.

The THORChain team applied an “Incentive Pendulum” mechanism, designed to adjust the RUNE-staker rewards seamlessly between liquidity providers and node operators based on the network’s demand and supply. However, this system was not perfect. Like many decentralized systems, THORChain suffered from early exploits which affected liquidity pools and led to temporary shutdowns, raising concerns around protocol security and operational risks tied to RUNE tokens.

A Rollercoaster of Forks and Recovery

The project was not immune to setbacks. One of the most notable challenges came from a series of devastating exploits in July 2021, wherein THORChain incurred heavy losses from vulnerability exploits in its smart contracts. These exploits temporarily damaged trust in the security of the protocol and, by extension, RUNE itself. Recovery was slow but steady, with the team shifting focus towards hardening the network’s security.

Following the incidents, the development emphasized more rigorous audits and insurer services, pledging stricter bonding requirements for validators who stake RUNE. Consequently, the THORChain ecosystem began to rebound from these growing pains.

How RUNE Works

How THORChain’s RUNE Works: Functionality and Mechanics

RUNE as the Liquidity and Settlement Asset

RUNE serves as the base asset within the THORChain network, powering liquidity pools and facilitating swaps. It operates as a cross-chain settlement asset, allowing users to swap between different Layer 1 chains like Ethereum or Binance Chain without requiring wrapped tokens. This is achieved through THORChain's Continuous Liquidity Pools (CLPs), where every supported asset is paired with RUNE. By pairing every asset with RUNE, the network maintains deep liquidity across multiple chains, ensuring efficient swaps with minimal slippage.

The critical role of RUNE in liquidity pools is further highlighted by its slip-based fee mechanism. Unlike traditional constant product market makers, where fees are fixed regardless of trade size, THORChain implements slip-based fees that increase as trade size grows relative to the pool's liquidity. This model disincentivizes large trades that might disproportionately impact pool reserves, thereby protecting liquidity providers (LPs) from impermanent loss.

The Security and Sybil Protection Mechanism

THORChain operates with a tendermint-based Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus, securing its native blockchain. To safeguard the network from potential attacks, THORChain leverages economic security by requiring node operators to bond a significant amount of RUNE. This bonding directly influences the economic alignment of network participants. Specifically, the protocol enforces a requirement that the total value of bonded RUNE must always exceed the value of pooled assets by a ratio of 2:1. If pool values exceed bonded RUNE, incentives skew toward LPs rather than node operators, ensuring that system governance and security remain economically balanced.

One aspect of concern within this model is node centralization. Given the high cost of RUNE bonding, some critics argue that the requirement for nodes to bond significant amounts of RUNE may prohibit smaller validators from participating, effectively centralizing control over governance and network security toward larger players. This could potentially increase the risk of collusion within the validator set.

RUNE and Network Incentives

THORChain’s token economics are carefully designed around a dual-incentive model, rewarding both liquidity providers and node operators with RUNE. Liquidity providers earn RUNE from trading fees and newly minted tokens, while node operators receive rewards for securing the network. However, the deterministic nature of these rewards can sometimes lead to over-inflation concerns, particularly if network demand does not keep pace with emission rates

Use Cases

Use Cases of RUNE in the THORChain Ecosystem

The RUNE token serves as the native utility and governance token within the THORChain decentralized liquidity protocol. Its use cases are tightly integrated with the operational mechanics of the ecosystem, extending across various dimensions including liquidity provision, staking, governance, and security.

Liquidity Provision and Impermanent Loss Protection

One of the primary use cases for RUNE is its role in liquidity pools. RUNE functions as a settlement asset, meaning it serves as the intermediary asset for all assets added to liquidity pools within THORChain. For example, when a user deposits an asset like Bitcoin or Ethereum, half of the value is automatically swapped to RUNE. This ensures deep liquidity for cross-chain pairs and guarantees that RUNE is always part of every liquidity pool.

RUNE's use here also ties in with the protocol’s mechanisms for impermanent loss mitigation. Though THORChain’s architecture rewards liquidity providers (LPs) and compensates for impermanent loss, the dual nature of exposure to RUNE introduces volatility risks to liquidity providers depending on RUNE's market performance. This makes RUNE integral to both liquidity earning strategies and the vulnerabilities accompanying it.

Consensus and Security

Another critical use of RUNE is within the consensus and security framework of THORChain. Validators (known as "nodes" in the network) are required to bond RUNE in order to participate in the protocol’s consensus mechanism. The amount of RUNE that needs to be staked acts as a deterrent against malicious behavior, ensuring security. Importantly, RUNE not only enables validators to undertake block validation but also sets the economic equilibrium between the bonded and pooled amounts, which maintains the network's integrity. If the bonded stake drops too low compared to capital within liquidity pools, the protocol becomes more susceptible to attacks, highlighting the role RUNE plays in governance and security.

Governance and Network Dynamics

While THORChain is designed to function as a decentralized protocol, RUNE also enables specific governance features. Token holders can participate in key decisions regarding network upgrades and parameter changes via on-chain voting, providing decentralized governance that aligns with the interests of RUNE holders. However, like many governance tokens, participation in such voting may suffer from a concentration of influence amongst large RUNE holders, which can centralize decision-making, a potential issue for decentralized governance.

Cross-Chain Asset Settlement

RUNE's utility extends beyond liquidity and security, acting as the base settlement asset for cross-chain swaps. Its role allows for decentralized trading of non-pegged, native assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin between blockchains. However, this high degree of interdependence on RUNE for broader ecosystem operations exposes the token’s utility to potential scaling limitations, which could affect the efficiency of cross-chain transactions as the network grows.

RUNE Tokenomics

RUNE Tokenomics: Supply, Emission Schedule, and Incentive Structures

RUNE's Total Supply and Emission Schedule

RUNE, the native token of the THORChain ecosystem, has a fixed maximum supply of 500 million tokens. This capped supply inherently plays a key role in managing RUNE's supply dynamics and scarcity model. However, the circulating supply is affected by a variety of factors, chief among them being liquidity incentives, emissions, and staking/minting. Notably, RUNE follows a deflationary emission schedule, with a gradual reduction of newly released tokens over time.

The emission model follows a preset decline as the network achieves maturity, helping mitigate inflationary pressure in the long term. However, critics point out that in the early stages, the unlocked or vested tokens may create oversupply conditions that could pressure the market, especially if adoption rates do not keep pace with emissions. Thus, while the emission strategy gradually shifts toward scarcity, its early phases present a potential dilution risk.

Utility and Incentive Structures Within THORChain

RUNE serves multiple roles in the THORChain protocol, cementing its utility beyond speculative trading. First, it is required for liquidity provision across THORChain's cross-chain decentralized liquidity pools. Liquidity providers (LPs) must bond RUNE alongside other assets to enable permissionless swaps between pools. This use case is intended to create a constant demand for RUNE from LPs, balancing supply inflation.

Additionally, RUNE is essential to THORChain's security mechanism, where node operators must bond RUNE as collateral. The bonding incentives, tied to RUNE's value, disincentivize malicious activity within the network. However, skeptics argue that the security tie to the token price introduces volatility risks and governance centralization concerns, as wealthier operators can stake more.

Deflation Through Token Burning

One of the more unique aspects of RUNE’s tokenomics is its deflationary burning mechanism. Fees paid on THORChain swaps are partially burned, which theoretically reduces the total supply over time. When swaps are highly active, this burn mechanism could offset emission-based inflation. However, the effectiveness of this burn mechanism is contingent on consistent protocol utilization. If swap activity decreases, the burn rate reduces, potentially failing to counterbalance inflationary pressures adequately.

This interplay between inflation and deflation highlights a balancing act within RUNE's tokenomics driven by network utilization levels.

RUNE Governance

RUNE Governance: Decentralizing the Future of Liquidity

RUNE, the native token of the THORChain network, plays a vital role in the protocol’s governance. Unlike many proof-of-stake systems, THORChain utilizes a system of liquidity nodes to maintain the security and integrity of the network. These nodes, referred to as THORNodes, support the decentralization of control and decision-making within the ecosystem.

On-Chain Governance

A key aspect of RUNE governance is its on-chain voting mechanism, where RUNE holders can influence core protocol changes—such as new feature integrations, fee structures, or security upgrades. However, compared to some other DeFi governance models (like Maker or Compound), the THORChain governance framework is less developed. Critics argue that this could be a hindrance to full decentralization, particularly if decision-making remains concentrated within a smaller group of developers or core community members.

Reward incentives also play a critical role in keeping node operators aligned, with a portion of the yield distributed to those who stake RUNE in liquidity pools. Importantly, any node that tries to engage in malicious actions would lose its staked RUNE, ensuring an economic safeguard for maintaining honesty and decentralized power.

RUNE’s Role in Node Collateralization

Each THORNode is required to bond a significant amount of RUNE as collateral. This staked RUNE acts as a form of governance collateral, incentivizing each operator to act in the best interest of the network. The bonded RUNE also gives node operators a more extensive governance voice, which some see as problematic. In essence, those with larger stakes of RUNE can accumulate more governance influence, potentially leading to a semi-centralized power structure, negating the goals of full decentralization.

Off-Chain Governance Considerations

THORChain is also governed by an off-chain community of developers and contributors using a practice known as "rough consensus." This informal method is often used for smaller decisions that do not require a binding on-chain vote. While this flexibility is valuable in ensuring rapid decisions for urgent matters (i.e., responding to security attacks), it could also be exploited by influential groups acting in their own interests, again raising concerns about centralized governance risks within an ostensibly decentralized platform.

Technical future of RUNE

RUNE Technical Developments and Roadmap

Cross-Chain Liquidity and Interoperability Framework

RUNE, the native token of the Thorchain protocol, plays a pivotal role in its cross-chain liquidity and interoperability model. One of the most notable ongoing developments is enhancing RUNE's role in facilitating seamless swaps and liquidity across multiple blockchain ecosystems without dependency on centralized intermediaries or wrapped tokens. Thorchain continues to focus on optimizing its Chaosnet infrastructure to improve the security and scalability of cross-chain transactions, addressing lingering concerns about vulnerabilities in bridge mechanics. However, audits and testing are requisite ongoing efforts as the complexity of managing liquidity across chains exposes the protocol to potential exploits and operational risks.

Integration of IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication)

Thorchain RUNE is progressively aligning its architecture to support IBC, a protocol originally built for the Cosmos ecosystem. With IBC integration, RUNE could expand its liquidity pools and support interactions with a broader range of IBC-compliant chains. This is significant as it could improve cross-chain capital efficiency, reduce slippage, and provide new decentralized finance (DeFi) opportunities. Nevertheless, this roadmap presents technical challenges, particularly in maintaining consistency and security when dealing with different consensus mechanisms across multiple blockchain networks, each with its own protocol risks.

Asgardchain Development

Thorchain is actively working to evolve its native Asgardchain ecosystem. This development aims to differentiate its settlement layer from external chains while providing a more efficient solution for handling high throughput without compromising on decentralization. Early-stage developments in this area focus on reducing latency during swaps and stabilizing node consensus. However, the integration of a native chain like Asgardchain comes with its risks; protocol divergence could lead to future interoperability issues or centralization pressure if some chains become reliant on its architecture.

Node and Validator Improvements

Node operators in the Thorchain network play a central role in securing liquidity and validating swaps. In response to historical node collapses and exploitation risks, the Thorchain community is undergoing upgrades in node relay mechanisms and validator incentives. The goal is to provide a more robust failover system to prevent downtime and enhance the decentralized nature of node distribution. Despite these efforts, frequent upgrades and protocol adjustments create a considerable barrier for new validators, elevating concerns around centralization risks where only well-capitalized entities can maintain operational validators.

Continued Focus on Smart Contract Security

Smart contract security continues to be a key focal point for RUNE's development team. Thorchain has been targeted by exploitations due to vulnerabilities in its smart contract designs, which has led to loss of funds and trust erosion. Steps are being taken to incorporate more thorough audits and deploy verifiable delay functions (VDFs) to ensure transaction integrity across asynchronous block confirmations. While these efforts are aimed at reinforcing security, the complexity added to the contract architecture can inadvertently increase gas costs or lead to bottlenecks under high network activity.

Comparing RUNE to it’s rivals

Comparing RUNE to Rival Crypto Assets: Uniqueness and Limitations

RUNE vs. Ethereum (ETH) – Lack of General-Purpose Flexibility

While Ethereum has solidified itself as a cornerstone for decentralized finance (DeFi) projects, RUNE's unique focus on cross-chain liquidity via the THORChain protocol puts it in a different context. Unlike Ethereum's broad functionality, allowing developers to build a virtually infinite number of use cases, RUNE is more narrowly tailored to the specific function of cross-chain swaps. This specialization promotes efficient and secure swaps, but it's limited in terms of smart contract customization capabilities. Developers looking for a more holistic ecosystem may find Ethereum's flexibility appealing despite higher gas fees. RUNE offsets this with lower swap fees, but Ethereum still offers a versatility that RUNE simply cannot match.

RUNE vs. Cosmos (ATOM) – Specialization or Generalization?

Both RUNE and Cosmos share a common vision, aiming for blockchain interoperability. However, ATOM focuses broadly on creating an "Internet of blockchains," with its Tendermint consensus engine allowing various chains to communicate in the same ecosystem. RUNE's focus is arguably more precise, building DeFi-native applications that utilize cross-chain liquidity directly. Cosmos offers greater possibilities for developers seeking more integration, but RUNE's advantage is its emphasis on decentralized liquidity pools and security within its own ecosystem. The trade-off is that Cosmos can appeal to a broader range of developers with its general-purpose blockchain architecture, while RUNE excels specifically in DeFi-centric solutions.

RUNE vs. Binance Coin (BNB) – Different Forms of Utility

BNB and RUNE serve different functions within their ecosystems. BNB powers Binance transactions, provides users with fee discounts, and operates within the much broader Binance Smart Chain (BSC) ecosystem. Comparatively, RUNE centers solely on facilitating cross-chain swaps within THORChain. BNB’s utility extends across multiple use cases on the exchange and in token trading on BSC, offering more utility for users deeply embedded in Binance’s ecosystem. RUNE, however, has security advantages through decentralization, being less reliant on a centralized exchange and more focused on decentralized finance (DeFi), although this makes it somewhat niche.

RUNE vs. Polkadot (DOT) – Interoperability at Scale

Polkadot and THORChain have similar goals in solving the cross-chain problem, but Polkadot’s architecture is much broader. Polkadot's Relay Chain allows multiple parachains to operate with high levels of security and scalability. RUNE, on the other hand, is highly efficient but focuses almost exclusively on liquidity. This tailored mission makes RUNE a more direct option for cross-chain swaps specifically in the DeFi sector, while DOT aims for far broader blockchain interoperability. However, scalability with Polkadot may offer further long-term developer freedom that RUNE's highly specific use case doesn't address.

Primary criticisms of RUNE

Primary Criticism of RUNE

While RUNE, the native token of the Thorchain network, has certainly garnered attention for its cross-chain liquidity and decentralized approach, there have been notable criticisms from the crypto community regarding its design, economics, and execution.

Impermanent Loss Concerns

One of the major issues flagged by liquidity providers is the risk of impermanent loss. Since RUNE is essential to provide liquidity within pools, liquidity providers are directly exposed to RUNE price volatility in addition to the paired asset. While impermanent loss is a known risk in DeFi, the exposure to RUNE adds an additional layer of risk, especially for those who may only be seeking exposure to Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other non-RUNE assets. This makes Thorchain’s model less attractive for risk-averse participants.

Centralized Influence in the Early Stages

Despite Thorchain's goal of enabling complete decentralization, early concerns have been raised about the centralization of power during its developmental stage. In particular, the initial nodes responsible for validating the network were highly centralized, leading to concerns about Thorchain's ability to truly function in a decentralized manner. In addition, the role of certain core development teams in managing upgrades and governance decisions has led some participants to argue that Thorchain is still somewhat centralized in practice, even though the goal is progressive decentralization.

Security Vulnerabilities

RUNE and its parent protocol, Thorchain, have faced critical security vulnerabilities in the past. These vulnerabilities led to significant exploits, which exposed overextended security mechanisms and resulted in millions in lost funds. Security incidents in the codebase forced the team to halt operations temporarily, sparking concerns about whether Thorchain's security infrastructure is genuinely robust enough to support the complex multi-chain interactions it facilitates. These types of incidents not only shake investor confidence, but they also slow down much-needed adoption within the core DeFi community.

Complexity of Multi-Chain Interactions

Thorchain aims to offer seamless cross-chain liquidity, but the technical complexity required to achieve this is daunting. RUNE's utility depends on interactions across various blockchains, adding multiple layers of complexity for liquidity providers, developers, and users. Furthermore, this complexity introduces a steep learning curve, making it difficult for average crypto users to participate. At its core, Thorchain's decentralized liquidity service is not as user-friendly as competitors offering more streamlined, blockchain-specific services.

Founders

RUNE's Founding Team: Key Players Behind the THORChain Ecosystem

RUNE, the native token of THORChain, was developed by a decentralized team without an official centralized entity leading the project. This lack of a traditional corporate structure aligns with the ethos of decentralization that THORChain and the broader DeFi ecosystem espouse. However, the anonymity of the team has sparked both intrigue and skepticism within the crypto community.

Anonymity and Decentralization

Unlike many projects that tout the pedigree of their founders, RUNE’s founders remain largely anonymous. The project was originally incubated by a tight-knit group of developers, often described in forums and early community interactions as "THORChain Core." The team came together to build an infrastructure that could facilitate the decentralized swapping of native assets across multiple chains—a task that had yet to be fulfilled effectively by other projects at the time of THORChain’s launch.

While this approach has gained favor among privacy and decentralization advocates, it has also raised questions among institutional investors and long-term users who typically seek transparency from the leadership behind a project. The decision to keep the founding team under wraps has been justified as a protection mechanism, citing the potential legal ramifications that can be associated with building a decentralized exchange protocol.

Early Development and Ideation

The conceptualization of THORChain and RUNE started in 2018 through participation in a Binance hackathon. The core developers, many of whom had pre-existing ties in the blockchain development world, sought to create a scalable, cross-chain liquidity protocol. Despite emerging from a simple hackathon pitch, the project quickly gained traction thanks to the thorough planning and technical prowess exhibited by the early developers.

Over time, pseudonymous developers like "Nine Realms" (believed to be a group rather than an individual) and contributors under pseudonyms like "Erik Voorhees" have been involved with pushing the project forward. The progress has been notable, yet some developers from the original team have gradually reduced their involvement in day-to-day operations of THORChain, leaving some wariness about the project's continuity.

Community and Developer Interaction

The THORChain project relies heavily on community contributions, and many new developers have been integrated into the ecosystem over time. However, the original leadership group still has significant influence over the resource management of the protocol, particularly through its DAO-like governance structure. This has caused concerns around centralization creeping into what was originally promoted as a highly decentralized and autonomous platform.

Authors comments

This document was made by www.BestDapps.com

Sources

https://docs.thorchain.org/
https://thorchain.org/
https://thorchain.org/whitepaper
https://medium.com/thorchain/
https://runevault.org/
https://twitter.com/thorchain
https://messari.io/asset/thorchain-rune
https://github.com/thorchain
https://discord.com/invite/thorchain
https://blog.thorchain.org/thorchains-economic-security-43b71f1eeb34
https://defillama.com/chain/Thorchain
https://obernetwork.com/thorchain-rune-vs-other-blockchains-latest-comparison/
https://rune-base.org/rune-basics/
https://cointelegraph.com/tags/thorchain
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/thorchain/
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/thorchain
https://www.kraken.com/prices/thorchain-rune
https://cryptoslate.com/coins/thorchain/
https://www.binance.com/en/price/thorchain